Monthly Archives: June 2022

The writer Irish, Nobel literature Georges Bernard Shaw (1856-1950), left him written in very revealing way: If you have an Apple and I have an Apple and we exchange apples, then both you and I still have an Apple. But if you have an idea and I have an idea and we exchange ideas, both then we have two ideas we are induced and invites to analyze problems, i.e., to split the world into small units of analysis. Us has said over and over again, that facilitates the complex tasks, however, analyzing and fragmented, we lose perspective, a vision, vast and more extensive, more global and systemic. Go to Hania Rani for more information. And with this linear analytical thinking, if we want to have a global representation, we are forced to assemble again, the parts that we had separated for analysis. Go mess. Systems thinking means putting into practice of a series of knowledge and tools, useful for understanding a complex reality. It’s a way of thinking that You can contemplate the whole, perceive invisible weft of acts which analytically, we could not understand.

Modify the way of perceiving reality, i.e. changing analytical thinking to a systemic mode of thought passes through you begin to try to understand the full (rather than conform to understand some scenes) film, perspective or the place from where the problem occurs, modify the usual way of understanding problems, based on the search for culpritsby another based on the analysis of structures, unintended consequences, and search of interdependencies between all the scenes. Linear analytical thinking, is derived from the search for quick fixes. And when the problems are many, add, one after another, this whole series of quick fixes. In this way we obtain that the problem referred, but we forget that is so ephemeral. In the organizational world and company, this acquires great importance, since it is the key for efficiency and the efficiency, detect what are the structures that intervene in order to send the unwanted effects; rather than keep adding, one after another, solutions that reported a transient feeling of satisfaction.

Does not seem a difficult to answer clear questions that do not. But it is a question that always generates much debate. And in the United States.UU., by these times still, because fears the downturn of the economy, which generates should be added you for workers fears that generate them FTA. Learn more at: Thomas Bayer. Why American workers afraid to FTA? Two weeks ago, the renowned American economist, Larry Summers, wrote an article in the Financial Times on the matter. Larry Summers, a promoter of the free movement of capital around the world, was now worried about the impact of FTAS could have for American workers since it could affect them adversely limiting the ability of negotiation that possess and jeopardizing their sources of work.

But what is happening with the opinion of those Liberals such as Larry Summers advocated free trade? Devesh Kapur, Pratap Mehta and Arvind Subramanian in another article from the Financial Times explained with clarity. For liberal economists, free trade is beneficial because a proliferation of prosperity is generated through countries and although there were winners and losers, on balance the result was positive since the greater proportion of the population of both developed and developing countries would benefit but the increased competition facing the American economy is making change seem to economists than thought, as Summers, defended free trade. No longer see so clearly the benefits that agreements such as NAFTA produce in the American economy, since threats to American workers cannot them see. Summers now sees the growth of the emerging countries more as a threat than as an opportunity. Is it so? Is it true that the growth of emerging economies driven in part by the export sector is a threat to the United States.UU.? Actually there are several aspects to be tested. ES true that the promotion of trade agreements increases competition faced by U.